I don’t know about you but I’m getting more and more disappointed with the Philippine Post Office. A few months ago, I received a very important package from the United Nations and its sides were torn and were deliberately “put back together” by mere use of a transparent packing tape. You could just imagine how insulting that was — I wonder if an employee or two from the national or local post office thought that there was money inside the large envelope or probably some lucrative contracts?
And now, after traveling for two days, I come home and see my mails…and I find out that they were all supposed to be delivered last November and December! One package, for instance, was full of important coupons I could’ve used to avail of discounts during the Christmas holiday shopping sprees. Another letter contained a super cool gift certificate I could’ve used to avail of a P5,000-worth of spa services…the problem now is that the deadline for me to redeem the gift was December 31, 2008 %^&*%$#%) Isn’t this so disappointing? I’m actually furious about this!
I’m sure I’m not the only soul out there who has a ton of complaints against the Philippine Post Office. Does this mean it’s high time for the national government to give the PPO a much-needed “facelift” (or intense scrutiny of its services especially prompt deliveries of important letters and packages) or probably think of just closing it down?
What are your thoughts?
I’m sure that many of you have heard of the Dela Paz – Pangandaman alleged brawling incident last December 26, 2008 (yes, a mere 1 day after Christmas!) Just in case you haven’t, you may want to read this. You may also want to read Bambee Dela Paz’s blog entry here – Bambee is the sister of the 14-year old boy who allegedly got mauled, along with his 56-year old father, by Department of Agrarian Reform Secretary Nasser Pangandaman Sr. and his son Mayor Nasser Pangandaman Jr. of Masiu, Lanao del Sur, Mindanao.
Apart from the facts that the incident involved a 14-year old boy, government officials and their gun-toting bodyguards and that the younger Pangandaman is a leader of a town in Mindanao of all places (it’s controversial and embarrassing, really, especially since we Mindanaoans want to promote our island as a place with peace-loving people…how ironical, eh?), we have yet to see a solid result of the reported investigation on this matter.
While it’s true that the older Pangandaman has apologized and that the Dela Paz family has rejected the apology (I personally thought that the Pangandaman’s apology was super lame especially since 14-year old Bino’s ear bled after the alleged brawl and that Bino has been traumatized), I’m also very interested to know if the DAR secretary still deserves to be a part of the GRP peace negotiations panel.
Should a secretary who has gun-toting bodyguards, who got involved in a brawling incident over an argument about golfing etiquette and who has a temperamental son be included in a panel that’s supposed to discuss peace and order?
Has the national government reprimanded the secretary and his son? Shouldn’t there be administrative charges filed against the two? What they did was definitely conduct unbecoming of public servants!
Next week, President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo will be in Mindanao. She will travel to several areas in Mindanao for four days and incidentally, she will be in the Lanao del Sur area on January 6. I wonder if she will take that chance to talk to the younger Pangandaman – that if, if she hasn’t yet. Because let’s face it, whether the national government’s PR specialists admit it or not, this incident is really another blow against her administration.
On a personal note, I really hope that the Dela Paz family obtains justice. If only for Bino’s welfare.

Like












Full list of 58 erring contractors suspended by the DPWH – Mangima Road, Manolo Fortich contractor among those suspended
July 9, 2009
Announcements, Bukidnon, Business, Cagayan de Oro City, Commentary, Consumer, Controversial, Davao City, Mindanaoan Update, News, Tourism, Travel, malaybalay city
(No comments)
MINDANAO – If you’ve recently tried a Bukidnon-Cagayan de Oro City road trip or a Davao City-Bukidnon-Cagayan de Oro City road trip, then you’ve most likely noticed the bottleneck of traffic at the Mangima Road section of Sayre Highway, Manolo Fortich, Bukidnon, Mindanao.
There’s currently a road and rehabilitation project there and I absolutely dread that section. I was once stuck there for 5 hours (!) during a Malaybalay City to Cagayan de Oro City trip. It usually just takes me 2 hours. You could just imagine the amount of time I’ve wasted!
That Mangima Canyon Road repair project has been a cause of delays and loads of inconvenience for the riding public for months now. In fact, in an effort to ease the traffic somehow, the Provincial Government of Bukidnon has requested that no 10-wheeler trucks be allowed to pass that section from 6am to 8pm. Of course, in the many times that I’ve traversed that area, I’ve noticed that the trucks have already started to pass even as early as 6:30pm…which is something that I could perfectly understand because the owners of these trucks also have businesses to run. I mean, really, is it their fault (and the riding public’s fault) that the project contractor, Henry S. Oaminal Construction and General Merchandise, allegedly doesn’t have enough equipment to finish the project on time?
So when I received a copy of a Bukidnon Provincial Council resolution alerting the Provincial Bids and Awards Committee (BAC) of the various contractors recently suspended by the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), I was no longer surprised. Henry S. Oaminal Construction and General Merchandise, along with 57 others, is among the contractors suspended by the DPWH from participating in construction projects for reportedly violating government procurement laws.
DPWH Secretary Hermogenes Ebdane has reportedly requested other government agencies to also ban the same 58 erring contractors from participating in their own projects.
Here is the full list of the 58 contractors suspended by the DPWH for a period of one year:
1. A.C. Rivero Development Corp.
2. ADP construction and Supply
3. AFG Construction and Supply
4. Allencon Development Corp.
5. Annasor Construction and Trading
6. BMK Construction
7. Big Bertha Construction and Development
8. CBN Construction and supply
9. Chiara Construction
10. Cofe Jok Construction and Supply
11. Davao concrete products
12. E.M.L. Construction and Trading
13. F. Guerrea Construction
14. Good Fortune International Inc.
15. Henry S. Oaminal Construction and General Merchandise
16. Hi-Tri Development corp.
17. IBC International Builders Corp.
18. J Cordon Construction and Supply
19. J. Lee Construction
20.J.M Morales Construction and Supply
21. J.S. Layson & Co., Inc.
22. Jhall Marketing & Services
23. JHJ Construction
24. LMG Construction
25. LSD Construction and Supply
26. Muana Development Corp.
27. Palmares General Merchandise
28. Patrila builders, Performance Builders and Developers Corp.
29. R.B. Uriarte Construction
30. R.G. Erillo Construction Inc.
For you to always be kept updated with the latest in Mindanao, SUBSCRIBE TO MINDANAOAN (CLICK, CLICK!) It’s free, fast and easy! Read all Mindanao-related news through email!
31. Roprim Construction
32. Shak Construction
33. Shen Construction
34. Topmost Development Marketing Corp.
35. TSD Builders Construction and Supply
36. Waterton Construction and Realty Development Corp.
37. Werr Corporation International
38. Welex Construction
39. A.D. Construction
40. ACES Trafcon Exponents, Inc.
41. ALRAF Construction and Enterprises
42. ARN Builders
43. B.E Construction
44. CVAP Construction
45. ECDA Construction
46.Gampik Construction and Development Inc.
47. IHZA Construction
48.J&S Cuadra Construction and Supply
49. JECEL Construction and Supply
50. JLA Construction and supplies
51. KIRSKAT Venture
52. MBD General Construction
53. NFH Construction and Supply
54. NVF Construction
55. Rockworld Industries
56. Unayan Builders Construction and Supply
57. Villa Veronica construction
58. VNKC Construction
These 58 firms reportedly violated R.A. 9184 and Dep’t Order 35, series of 2008, for coming up with several excuses to hinder the bidding and the completion of the projects, and what is more, the most popular excuse given was that the projects were not profitable!
Moreover, the other reasons were that the Approved Budget Cost (ABC) is much lower than the proposed projects, and still, some cited as reason traffic jam problems.
Are you pissed as I am after reading those?
Wish ko lang matuman ning suspension!
Erring contractors should really be taught a lesson.
Oaminal Construction, according to DPWH, would have to finish the Mangima Road project (*groan*) but cannot get involved in any new bidding for a period of one year.